雅思口說part 3範文：沒有數據也能答得有條理

考官問你國家的人是否比二十年前讀得更少。你手上沒有任何數字。你只有一個印象，而印象感覺實在不夠，所以答案就在第三個字附近卡住了。

卡住來自一個錯誤前提。Part 3 不是常識問答；它是一場討論，而評分重點是你如何用英文比較、推測和解釋。接受這一點的考生，就不再尋找統計數字，而是開始回答問題。

這篇指南會給你數據題的結構、讓近似說法保持誠實的用語，以及兩個依照這個結構寫成的完整範例答案。這裡的題目與答案都是原創練習素材，不是官方或回憶題，且沒有任何答案經過評分或取得 band。

為什麼 Part 3 的數字題考的是語言，不是數據

Part 3 會沿著 Part 2 的主題，進入更一般、更抽象的討論，時間四到五分鐘。口說依四項標準評分，且權重相同：流暢與連貫、詞彙資源、文法多樣性與準確度、發音。這四項都不是事實查核。

評分描述說明了實際被獎勵的是什麼。Band 7 的詞彙資源包含 Effective use of paraphrase as required，而 Band 7 的流暢與連貫包含 Flexible use of spoken discourse markers, connectives and cohesive features。這兩行描述的考生，能重新框住問題、標出比較，並繼續說下去；而這正是看似無法回答的數字題所邀請你做的事。

這不是允許你捏造事實。一個自信但錯誤的數字，會引來你招架不住的追問，而且聽起來很單薄，因為背後什麼都沒有。下面這個誠實結構，也是比較容易撐過三十秒的說法。

用三句話思考：範圍、方向、原因

每個數據題的答案都可以用三句話組成，而且順序很重要：先限制主張，讓考官知道接下來會聽到哪種答案。

句子	任務	較弱版本	較強版本
第一句	限制主張	I don't know.	I don't have figures for that, but I can tell you what I see around me.
第二句	給出方向，不是規模	It's less.	It's clearly down, though probably not as much as people assume.
第三句	給出一個原因	Because of phones.	Mostly because a phone is what people reach for when they have five minutes.

這大約是二十五到三十五秒的口說，而且完全不用任何數字就回答了問題。如果考官想要更多，第三句會遞給他一條可以拉下去的線，而這正是你要的結果：一個你能回答的追問，比一段最後陷入沉默的獨白更有價值。

保持誠實的近似用語

下面這些用語不是填充詞。每一個都在告訴聽者，你的主張能承受多少重量；這就是近似與捏造之間的差別。

用語	它讓你承諾什麼	例句
in my experience	只是你自己的小樣本，僅此而已	In my experience, most people I know read on a phone now.
a small share	明顯少於一半，但沒有數字	Only a small share of the people I know still buy a newspaper.
roughly	一個被問到時你會辯護的估計	The number of readers is roughly the same; the format changed.
somewhere between	一個你能說出理由的範圍	For people my age it's somewhere between a third and a half of that, though that is a guess from my own circle.
the general direction	只有上升或下降	I'm confident about the general direction, not the size.

兩條規則能讓這些說法安全。對規模保留餘地，但絕不對方向保留：It has definitely gone down, though I couldn't tell you by how much 比含糊的 maybe it's a bit less 更有力。也絕不借用權威：如果你說不出研究名稱，就不要說 according to a study，因為那句話正是把誠實答案變成假答案的關鍵。

你可以重新組裝的雅思口說part 3範文

兩個原創問題，用三句模式回答。每段之後的說明會指出模式落在哪裡。

問題一：Do you think people read less than they did twenty years ago? I don't have any figures for that, so I can only go by what I see. In my experience it's clearly down, but mainly in one specific way. People still read a lot; they just read on a phone, so the amount has stayed roughly the same while the format changed, mostly because a phone is what you reach for when you have five minutes.

問題二：Is it more expensive to be young today than it was for your parents? That's hard to compare directly, because what people spend money on has changed. From what I can see, housing has become much harder and almost everything else has become cheaper, so the answer depends on whether you need somewhere to live. I think that's why the argument never settles: two people can look at the same decade and describe completely different lives.

問題一把自己限制在個人觀察，接著給出方向，然後解釋方向。問題二稍微難一點：它承認這個問題沒有單一答案，並說明答案取決於什麼；這在討論中是正當做法，讀起來像掌控，而不是迴避。

趨勢動詞與讓它們準確的副詞

一旦有了方向，動詞會決定你聽起來多精確，副詞則決定這份精確是否誠實。

動詞	它表達什麼	讓它保持誠實的副詞
rise, climb	向上移動	逐漸變化用 steadily；只有說得出原因時才用 sharply
plateau, level off	停止上升，但仍在高位	after a long climb
dip	小幅、暫時的下降	slightly，或 briefly
stay flat	沒有真正變化	more or less，承認你的看法是近似的
fall back	回到較早的水準	to where it was
overtake	一條線超過另一條線	in the last few years

時態也承載意義。It has risen steadily since the nineties 涵蓋一路延續到現在的時期；It rose steadily through the nineties 涵蓋已經結束的時期。名詞形式也值得準備好，因為它們能讓你變化句型：a steady rise、a slight dip、a sharp fall。把強動詞配上弱副詞，或反過來，就是一個原本不錯的答案開始聽起來像沒人寫過的新聞報導的最常見方式。

不用任何數字比較兩個群體

比較題最容易掉進假統計，因為句型本身就在引誘你這麼做。以下五個框架可以避開。

• Young people spend more on rent than their parents did at the same age.
• Older people still read newspapers, whereas younger people mostly read on phones.
• The opposite is true for people who grew up without the internet.
• By contrast, the cost of almost everything else has fallen.
• The gap seems to be widening, though I couldn't tell you by how much.

有一個文法點值得練習：compared with 接名詞，所以 compared with their parents 是對的；而 than 接子句，所以 than their parents did 是對的。把兩者混在一起，例如 compared with their parents did，就是在思考論點而不是句子時很容易犯的錯誤。

八題練習與自創統計數字自我檢查

用計時器，把每一題用三句話說出來。第一次目標三十秒，第二次目標四十五秒。

1. Do you think people in your country read less than they did twenty years ago?
2. Are young people today better at saving money than their parents were?
3. Has the way people shop changed much in your lifetime?
4. Do you think cities are getting more crowded?
5. Is it cheaper to eat at home than to eat out where you live?
6. Do people in your country take more holidays than they used to?
7. Which costs more, owning a car or using public transport?
8. Do you think the number of people learning a second language is growing?

然後對你的錄音做自我檢查。任何你說不出來源的數字，都改寫成方向。任何百分比都刪掉，改說 more、less 或 about the same。任何 according to 都要有名字，否則就刪掉。任何以 Statistics show 開頭的句子都整句刪除，因為那是考官最常聽到、也最不相信的句子。如果一段錄音通過這四項檢查，你就有一個聽起來有根據、卻不含任何沒有依據數字的答案。

常見問題

我需要在雅思口說 Part 3 提供真實統計數字嗎？

不需要。四項評分標準描述的是語言，而一個方向加一個原因，就能不用數字回答問題。捏造百分比比承認自己知識的極限更冒險，因為它會創造出一個你必須在下一題辯護的主張。

Part 3 的答案應該多長？

三到五句，大約三十到四十五秒，通常就夠了。Part 3 把四到五分鐘給整個討論，所以一個很長的答案會花掉後面問題需要的時間。回答完就停下來，讓考官問下一題。